top of page
A trademark infringement claim can still be sought based on unjust enrichment after the statute of limitations has expired
Ultimately, the court determined that the plaintiff was aware of the defendant's infringing act during the opposition stage, and that the statute of limitations for claiming damages for trademark infringement should have commenced at that time. Therefore, the court ruled that the plaintiff's right to claim damages for trademark infringement was time-barred.
Ching-I Lu呂靜怡律師
Jul 9
Malicious squatting of Australian trademarks may constitute a tort under the latter paragraph of Article 184 (Ⅰ) of the Civil Code
Malicious squatting of Australian trademarks may constitute a tort
Ching-I Lu呂靜怡律師
Jan 22, 2024
A trademark only famous but not used in Taiwan still applies unfair competition law
A trademark only famous but not used in Taiwan still applies unfair competition law
Ching-I Lu呂靜怡律師
Jan 22, 2024
Maliciously squatting trademark owner constitutes an abuse of right
The Decision The Supreme Court (111 tashang 16) held in 2022 that this trademark infringement lawsuit violates the principle of good...
Ching-I Lu呂靜怡律師
Mar 23, 2023
The Impact that the Exhaustion Principle still Applies to Different Domestic Trademark Owners
if the domestic and foreign owners are different, is the Exhaustion principle still applicable?
Ching-I Lu呂靜怡律師
Aug 3, 2022
bottom of page